Citadel / Citadel Securities interview questions

How Citadel / Citadel Securities's process runs, as candidates and the firm describe it, and the questions candidates report, each with a worked solution. Free, no sign-up.

Practise these in the app Mock interview

How Citadel / Citadel Securities interviews

Sources: Glassdoor: Citadel quant trader

Questions (6)

Try each one before opening the solution. Interviewers change the numbers, so learn the method.

Quantitative Trader · Interview · Expected value · reported by a candidate

A fair die is rolled and you receive the cube of the result.

  1. What is the expected value?
    Answer and worked solution

    Answer: 73.5

    Key idea. Average the six payouts directly.

    1. Cubes: 1, 8, 27, 64, 125, 216. Sum = 441.
    2. E = 441/6 = 73.5.

    Check. Shortcut: 1³ + … + n³ = (1 + … + n)² = 21² = 441.

  2. Follow-up (ours): what is (E[X])³, and why is it smaller?
    Answer and worked solution

    Answer: 42.875

    Key idea. Jensen's inequality: for a convex function f, E[f(X)] ≥ f(E[X]).

    1. (E[X])³ = 3.5³ = 3.5 × 12.25 = 42.875.
    2. x³ is convex for x > 0, so E[X³] (73.5) exceeds it.

    Check. The same idea is why options gain value with volatility: their payoff is convex.

Interviewers may push further: What is the variance of the payout?

Source: Glassdoor · Try it in the app →

Quant Trader Intern · Interview · Expected value · reported by a candidate

You roll a fair die until every face has appeared at least once.

Also reported at Da Vinci.

  1. What is the expected number of rolls?
    Answer and worked solution

    Answer: 14.7

    Key idea. Coupon collector: one stage per new face.

    1. With k faces seen, a roll is new with probability (6 − k)/6: mean wait 6/(6 − k).
    2. Sum: 6(1 + ½ + ⅓ + ¼ + ⅕ + ⅙) = 6 × 2.45.
    3. = 14.7.

    Check. For n faces it grows like n ln n.

Interviewers may push further: Roughly how does this grow for an n-sided die? (n ln n.)

Source: Glassdoor · Try it in the app →

Quant Trader Intern · Interview · Statistics · reported by a candidate

Which is more likely: 40 to 60 heads in 100 fair flips, or 400 to 600 heads in 1000?

  1. What is the probability of 40–60 heads in 100 flips (to two decimal places)?
    Answer and worked solution

    Answer: 0.9648

    Key idea. Measure each range in standard deviations.

    1. 100 flips: σ = 5, so 40–60 is ±2σ. P ≈ 0.95; with the endpoints included, exactly 0.965.
    2. 1000 flips: σ ≈ 15.8, so 400–600 is about ±6.3σ: essentially certain.
    3. So the 1000-flip range is far more likely.

    Check. The same ±10% window covers more standard deviations as n grows (σ grows like √n).

Source: Glassdoor · Try it in the app →

Quantitative Trader · Interview · Expected value · reported by a candidate

The numbers 1 to 5 are placed around a circle in random order.

  1. What is the expected number of numbers smaller than both their neighbours?
    Answer and worked solution

    Answer: 5/3 ≈ 1.6667

    Key idea. Linearity of expectation over the 5 positions.

    1. A number and its two neighbours are three distinct values in random order.
    2. P(it's the smallest) = 1/3.
    3. E = 5 × 1/3 = 5/3.

Source: Glassdoor · Try it in the app →

Semi-Systematic Trader · Interview · Market making · reported by a candidate

Make a market on the square root of 30.

  1. First, your best estimate of √30 to two decimal places.
    Answer and worked solution

    Answer: 5.4772

    Key idea. Start from a nearby square and take one Newton step.

    1. 5.5² = 30.25, slightly high.
    2. Newton: x − (x² − 30)/(2x) = 5.5 − 0.25/11 ≈ 5.477.
    3. √30 ≈ 5.48. Quote tightly around it, e.g. 5.47 @ 5.49.

    Check. 5.477² ≈ 29.998.

    Trap. Quoting very wide on something you can compute: it signals you don't trust your own arithmetic.

Source: Glassdoor · Try it in the app →

Trader · Interview · Behavioural · reported by a candidate

Behavioural questions candidates report:

Answer one out loud, as you would in the interview.

Model answer

Three parts, about a minute each. Why trading: a specific moment you got hooked (a game, a market you followed, a decision under uncertainty), not "I like maths". Why this firm: something concrete about how it trades or trains people, ideally from talking to someone there or from its own material. Why you: evidence you already think in probabilities and react well to being wrong. Avoid anything about money or prestige.

Source: Glassdoor · Try it in the app →

Other firms

Jane Street · SIG (Susquehanna) · Optiver · IMC · Five Rings · Two Sigma · Flow Traders · Maven Securities · Wincent · Akuna Capital · Da Vinci Derivatives · DRW · Common formats · Hudson River Trading · Jump Trading · Eclipse Trading · Old Mission · Belvedere Trading · Squarepoint Capital · Valkyrie Trading · Virtu Financial · Tibra · Tower Research Capital · D. E. Shaw · Mako

Practise by subject instead: topic guides.