How SIG (Susquehanna)'s process runs, as candidates and the firm describe it, and the questions candidates report, each with a worked solution. Free, no sign-up.
Commonly described as 4 stages: online quant test → recruiter call with at least one probability/EV question → ~60-min technical with a senior trader (probability, Markov chains) → final round with EV games and a group board-game exercise.
Strong decision-theory and poker culture: they test whether you think in expected value rather than the most likely outcome.
Assistant Trader · Interview · Combinatorics · reported by a candidate
A deck has 97 distinct numbered cards. Four are drawn. If they come out in ascending order (not necessarily consecutive) you're paid $10; otherwise you pay $1.
(a) What is the probability the four cards are in ascending order?
Answer and worked solution
Answer: 1/24 ≈ 0.041667
Key idea. Symmetry: any 4 distinct cards are equally likely to appear in each of their orders.
4 cards have 4! = 24 orders.
Exactly one is ascending.
P = 1/24 ≈ 0.0417.
Check. The 97 doesn't matter. With 3 cards it would be 1/6; the pattern is 1/k!.
Trap. Trying to count increasing 4-tuples from 97 cards. It works, but it's slow and error-prone: C(97, 4)/(97·96·95·94) is still 1/24.
(b) What is your expected profit per game?
Answer and worked solution
Answer: -13/24 ≈ -0.54167
Key idea. Weight the win and the loss by their probabilities.
Win $10 with probability 1/24, lose $1 with probability 23/24.
EV = 10/24 − 23/24 = −13/24 ≈ −$0.54.
Check. The fair payout would be $23: then 23/24 − 23/24 = 0.
Interviewers may push further: What payout makes this fair? What if the deck had repeated numbers?
Quantitative Trader · Interview · Logic · reported by a candidate
You have 25 swimmers and a pool with five lanes but no stopwatch: a race only tells you the order of the five in it.
Also reported at Squarepoint with horses. We assume speeds are consistent and all different.
What is the fewest races needed to find the three fastest?
Answer and worked solution
Answer: 7
Key idea. Use each race's information: who can still be in the top three?
Races 1–5: heats of five.
Race 6: the five heat winners. Its winner is the fastest overall.
Candidates for 2nd and 3rd: 2nd and 3rd from the winner's heat; 1st and 2nd from the heat of the race-6 runner-up; 1st from the heat of the race-6 third place. Five swimmers.
Race 7: those five. Total: 7 races.
Check. Anyone else has at least three swimmers known to be faster.
Quantitative Trader · Interview · Probability · reported by a candidate
The probability of seeing at least one hawk in an hour is 0.8.
You need a model for when hawks arrive. The natural one: arrivals at a constant rate, independent across time (a Poisson process). State that assumption out loud.
What is the probability of seeing at least one in half an hour?
Answer and worked solution
Answer: 0.55279
Key idea. Assume hawks arrive at a steady rate, independently over time (a Poisson process).
P(none in an hour) = 0.2 = P(none in ½ hour)².
P(none in ½ hour) = √0.2 ≈ 0.447.
P(at least one in ½ hour) ≈ 0.553.
Check. More than half of 0.8, because two halves can both contain hawks.
Trap. Answering 0.4. Probabilities don't halve with time; the rate does.
Assistant Trader Intern · Interview · Game theory · reported by a candidate
Two players take turns adding a whole number from 1 to 10 to a running total that starts at 0. Whoever makes the total exactly 50 wins (you can't go over).
You go first. What number should you say first?
Answer and worked solution
Answer: 6
Key idea. Work backwards from 50 to find the totals you want to say.
If you say 39, every reply (40–49) lets you reach 50.
The same holds 11 below each winning total: 50, 39, 28, 17, 6.
Say 6 first, then always bring the total to the next one in the list.
Check. 11 is (largest move + 1): whatever they add, you add the rest.
Interviewers may push further: What if the target were 55? (Then you'd want to go second.)
Trader · Interview · Behavioural · reported by a candidate
Behavioural questions candidates report:
Why do you want to trade, and why SIG?
Answer one out loud, as you would in the interview.
Model answer
Three parts, about a minute each. Why trading: a specific moment you got hooked (a game, a market you followed, a decision under uncertainty), not "I like maths". Why this firm: something concrete about how it trades or trains people, ideally from talking to someone there or from its own material. Why you: evidence you already think in probabilities and react well to being wrong. Avoid anything about money or prestige.